If you were the manager of a service firm and wanted to apply the gaps model to improveservice, which gap would you start with? Why? In what order would you proceed to closethe gaps

The Gaps Model of Service Quality, developed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry, identifies five gaps that can occur in the service delivery process.

Get the full solved assignment PDF of MMPM-005 of 2023-24 session now.

These gaps represent areas where customer expectations and perceptions may diverge. As a manager of a service firm aiming to improve service quality, I would start by addressing Gap 1, followed by a systematic approach to close subsequent gaps. Here’s the rationale for starting with Gap 1 and the recommended order to proceed:

Gap 1: Knowledge Gap (Understanding Customer Expectations)

Reason to Start with Gap 1:

• Definition: Gap 1 exists when there is a difference between customer expectations and management’s perceptions of those expectations.
• Rationale: This gap highlights a lack of understanding of customer expectations. By addressing Gap 1 first, the service firm can gain insights into what customers truly expect. It lays the foundation for aligning internal perceptions with customer expectations.

Actions to Close Gap 1:

1. Conduct Market Research:

• Use surveys, focus groups, and feedback mechanisms to gather data on customer expectations. Understand what customers value, what they expect, and where there might be discrepancies.

1. Customer Feedback Analysis:

• Analyze customer feedback, complaints, and reviews to identify recurring themes and areas of concern. This helps in pinpointing specific aspects of the service that may not align with customer expectations.

1. Employee Training on Customer Expectations:

• Provide training to employees to enhance their awareness of customer expectations. Ensure that front-line staff has a clear understanding of what customers value and expect from the service.

Subsequent Gaps:

Once Gap 1 has been addressed, the focus can shift to closing the subsequent gaps:

Gap 2: Policy Gap (Setting Service Standards)

Reason to Address Gap 2 Second:

• Definition: Gap 2 occurs when there is a difference between management perceptions and service quality specifications.
• Rationale: After understanding customer expectations (Gap 1), the service firm can adjust internal service quality specifications to better align with those expectations. This involves setting clear service standards and policies.

Actions to Close Gap 2:

1. Review and Update Service Standards:

• Assess existing service standards and policies. Ensure that they are realistic, achievable, and aligned with customer expectations as identified in Gap 1.

1. Employee Training on Service Standards:

• Communicate updated service standards to employees and provide training to ensure that they understand and adhere to the revised policies.

Gap 3: Delivery Gap (Service Performance)

Reason to Address Gap 3 Third:

• Definition: Gap 3 occurs when there is a difference between service quality specifications and the service actually delivered.
• Rationale: With updated service standards in place (Gap 2), the focus shifts to ensuring that the service delivered matches those specifications. This involves addressing issues related to employee performance and processes.

Actions to Close Gap 3:

1. Employee Training and Empowerment:

• Provide ongoing training to employees to enhance their skills and capabilities. Empower employees to address customer needs and resolve issues in real-time.

1. Process Improvement:

• Evaluate and improve internal processes to ensure they align with service standards. Streamline workflows and eliminate bottlenecks that may hinder the delivery of high-quality service.

Gap 4: Communication Gap (External Communication)

Reason to Address Gap 4 Fourth:

• Definition: Gap 4 occurs when there is a difference between service delivery and external communications to customers.
• Rationale: After addressing internal issues related to service delivery (Gap 3), the focus shifts to external communication to ensure that customers are informed accurately about the service.

Actions to Close Gap 4:

1. Clear Communication Strategies:

• Develop clear and accurate communication strategies to convey service offerings, benefits, and any changes. Avoid overpromising and ensure that external messaging aligns with actual service delivery.

1. Feedback Mechanisms:

• Implement mechanisms for customers to provide feedback on their experiences. Use this feedback to refine communication strategies and address any misunderstandings.

Gap 5: Perception Gap (Customer Perception)

Reason to Address Gap 5 Last:

• Definition: Gap 5 occurs when there is a difference between customer expectations and perceptions of the service received.
• Rationale: Gap 5 reflects the ultimate perception gap that arises when there are discrepancies in customer expectations and their actual experiences. By addressing the preceding gaps, the aim is to minimize this final perception gap.

Actions to Close Gap 5:

1. Continuous Monitoring and Adaptation:

• Implement continuous monitoring of customer perceptions through surveys, feedback, and performance metrics. Adapt service delivery and communication strategies based on ongoing insights.

1. Service Recovery Strategies:

• Develop robust service recovery strategies to address any issues promptly. Swift and effective resolution of problems can positively influence customer perceptions.

Overall Approach:

• The recommended approach is sequential, with each gap addressed in order. However, it’s important to note that service improvement is an ongoing process. Continuous monitoring, feedback loops, and adaptability are key elements to sustain service quality over time.

By systematically addressing the Gaps Model, a service firm can create a more customer-centric approach, align internal processes with customer expectations, and enhance overall service quality.