The lines you’ve quoted appear to be a paraphrase or interpretation of a theme related to the myth of Pygmalion and Galatea.
Get the full solved assignment PDF of MEG-02 of 2023-24 session now.
The myth comes from Ovid’s “Metamorphoses,” and it tells the story of a sculptor named Pygmalion who falls in love with a statue he has created, named Galatea. The gods, seeing Pygmalion’s pure and sincere love, bring the statue to life.
The phrase “Galatea never does quite like Pygmalion: relation to her is too godlike to be altogether agreeable” seems to suggest a modern interpretation or commentary on the myth, possibly highlighting the complexity or challenges in the relationship between Pygmalion and Galatea. Here’s an analysis of the statement:
- Idealization and Godlike Quality:
- In the original myth, Pygmalion idealizes Galatea to the point of falling in love with his own creation. The phrase “relation to her is too godlike” could refer to Pygmalion’s godlike role as a creator who brings life to an inanimate object. This godlike quality might make the relationship unequal or challenging.
- Unattainable Standards:
- If Galatea is too godlike, it might suggest that she embodies unattainable ideals or perfection. Pygmalion’s love for her may be based on an unrealistic standard, making it difficult for the relationship to be entirely agreeable.
- Lack of Reciprocity:
- The statement implies that Galatea never quite likes Pygmalion. This could mean that the relationship lacks reciprocity or genuine emotional connection. Galatea, being a creation brought to life, may not share the same emotional depth or connection with Pygmalion.
- Discomfort with Godlike Status:
- Galatea’s discomfort with the godlike status of her creator suggests a tension in the power dynamic of their relationship. Pygmalion’s role as a creator and the godlike quality of their connection might create a sense of unease or imbalance.
- Altogether Agreeable:
- The phrase “altogether agreeable” suggests that, despite Pygmalion’s love and efforts, the relationship is not entirely pleasant or satisfactory. There may be inherent challenges and complexities arising from the godlike nature of their connection.
This interpretation reflects a nuanced view of the Pygmalion and Galatea myth, emphasizing the potential difficulties in a relationship where one party holds a godlike or creator status. It explores themes of idealization, unattainable standards, and the potential lack of reciprocity in a relationship characterized by a significant power imbalance.