Describe the Nozick’s ‘entitlement theory’ and the theory of ‘justice in distribution

Nozick’s Entitlement Theory:

Get the full solved assignment PDF of MEC-106 of 2023-24 session now.

Robert Nozick’s “entitlement theory” of justice, presented in his book “Anarchy, State, and Utopia,” is a libertarian perspective on distributive justice. The theory is based on the concept of justice in acquisition, justice in transfer, and justice in rectification.

1. Justice in Acquisition:

• Individuals are entitled to acquire and possess holdings through voluntary transactions, labor, or original appropriation. Nozick argues that as long as acquisitions are based on just principles (without violating others’ rights), they are legitimate.

1. Justice in Transfer:

• Once holdings are justly acquired, individuals are free to transfer them to others through voluntary exchanges. As long as the transfers are consensual and not coercive, they are considered just.

1. Justice in Rectification:

• If holdings are acquired or transferred unjustly, the theory supports the idea of rectification. Nozick suggests correcting past injustices through compensatory measures without violating current just holdings.

1. Minimal State:

• Nozick advocates for a minimal state that only enforces basic rights and protects individuals from force and fraud. He rejects wealth redistribution beyond rectification, arguing that any form of forced redistribution infringes on individuals’ rights.

Theory of Justice in Distribution:

The theory of justice in distribution, on the other hand, is a broader concept that encompasses various perspectives on how resources and benefits should be distributed in a society. It contrasts with Nozick’s entitlement theory in its emphasis on ensuring a more equitable distribution of resources, often addressing social and economic inequalities.

1. Egalitarianism:

• Egalitarian theories advocate for the equal distribution of resources among members of society. This could involve equalizing income, wealth, or opportunities to promote a more equal and just society.

1. Utilitarianism:

• Utilitarian theories focus on maximizing overall happiness or welfare. In terms of distribution, resources should be allocated to maximize the overall well-being of society, even if this means unequal distributions in certain cases.

1. Rawlsian Justice:

• John Rawls proposed a theory of justice that prioritizes the well-being of the least advantaged. His “difference principle” allows for inequalities only if they benefit the least well-off members of society.

1. Communitarian Justice:

• Communitarian perspectives emphasize the importance of communal values and shared norms. Distribution is seen in the context of fostering a sense of community and social cohesion.

In summary, while Nozick’s entitlement theory is rooted in libertarian principles, the theory of justice in distribution encompasses a range of perspectives, each offering different approaches to achieving a just distribution of resources within a society.